This project is maintained by mslafrenie
Unprocessed Photographic View
While examining this coin consider the following:
After exploring the unprocessed photographic view of this coin take a look at the RTI default view!
RTI Default View:
Instructions for use: 1) Click on the light bulb icon, 2) Drag cursor across image to move light position, 3) Select the question mark icon for further help.
Now that you have viewed both the unprocessed image and the RTI model, take a look at the background information for this coin and my close reading of the myth identified as part of its banal nationalistic power:
Designer: Michelle Thibodeau
Release Date: December 2000
Alternative Title: Canada in the World
Description: This “coin portrays Canada’s continuing leadership and contributions to the global community.”
Myth Identified: Myth of Peacekeeping via global citizenship
My Close Reading:
Excerpt from RTI Investigation:
“We can unpack this myth through RTI, by visually and materially engaging with each aspect of the Community coin. Positioned directly in the middle, this design features a raised circle with a map of Canada clearly defined. In recognizing the map of Canada and the icons/imagery surrounding it, we can draw parallels to the familiar visuals of humanitarian projects—such as Hands Around the World and United Nations relief projects and funds—that this circle is indeed meant to symbolize the world or global community. What stands out the most about the Community coin under RTI investigation is the style of this design. Each icon on the coin, excluding the precise etching of Canada’s landmass appears to be drawn in a child-like or amateur style, which was part of the global citizenship appeal of the 1990s. In Canada, global citizenship, particularly in the 1990s and 2000s, was directed at youths in classrooms across the country and called on them to inspire change at local and global levels.[94]”
NOTE:
Excerpt from Investigation of Myth:
“For much of the late twentieth century, young Canadians understood their place in the global community through peacekeeping, acting as neutral intermediaries, and operating as a soft/middle power. These imaginings are reciprocal in nature because the way Canada imagines itself is often confirmed by its successful communication to and acceptance by the global community. In this sense, I refer to the power of Canada’s international image in reflecting and reinforcing a sense of Canadian identity domestically that is predicated on their perceived roles, mores, and values based in community-building and multiculturalism.[93]
[…]
[The] myth presented by the Community coin has everything to do with how Canada perceived itself at the turn of the millennium and previously—it is a reflection what many wanted Canada to be at the time. So, what this coin asks its audience to do, is to forget or ignore all the ways in which Canada is complicit in the same or similar colonial and imperial acts as the nations it is lauded for intervening on behalf of and protecting.”
NOTE”